Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
The High Court ruled on the cancellation of GST registration due to non-functional business premises. The court found violations of Rule 25 of CGST Rules as physical verification was not done in the presence of concerned persons. The State Tax Officer had admitted the existence of the petitioner's unit prior to issuing a show cause notice for cancellation. The petitioner had informed about changing the principal place of business, which was acknowledged. The court directed restoration of GST registration retroactively from 20.09.2022, allowing filing of annual returns with late fees. Petition disposed off.
The High Court ruled on the cancellation of GST registration due to non-functional business premises. The court found violations of Rule 25 of CGST Rules as physical verification was not done in the presence of concerned persons. The State Tax Officer had admitted the existence of the petitioner's unit prior to issuing a show cause notice for cancellation. The petitioner had informed about changing the principal place of business, which was acknowledged. The court directed restoration of GST registration retroactively from 20.09.2022, allowing filing of annual returns with late fees. Petition disposed off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
