Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The ITAT considered the taxability of salary earned in China by an individual residing in China. The AO argued that the salary was taxable in India due to an existing employer-employee relationship. However, the ITAT agreed with the argument that as the individual was a tax resident of China, the salary income was taxable in China only. The ITAT held that the salary for services in China was exempt u/s Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. The ITAT directed the AO to allow the exemption, noting that the proportionate salary for services in India had already been taxed in India and the remaining salary in China. The individual had not claimed foreign tax credit. Decision favored the assessee.
The ITAT considered the taxability of salary earned in China by an individual residing in China. The AO argued that the salary was taxable in India due to an existing employer-employee relationship. However, the ITAT agreed with the argument that as the individual was a tax resident of China, the salary income was taxable in China only. The ITAT held that the salary for services in China was exempt u/s Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. The ITAT directed the AO to allow the exemption, noting that the proportionate salary for services in India had already been taxed in India and the remaining salary in China. The individual had not claimed foreign tax credit. Decision favored the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
