Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT considered the taxability of salary earned in China by an individual residing in China. The AO argued that the salary was taxable in India due to an existing employer-employee relationship. However, the ITAT agreed with the argument that as the individual was a tax resident of China, the salary income was taxable in China only. The ITAT held that the salary for services in China was exempt u/s Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. The ITAT directed the AO to allow the exemption, noting that the proportionate salary for services in India had already been taxed in India and the remaining salary in China. The individual had not claimed foreign tax credit. Decision favored the assessee.
The ITAT considered the taxability of salary earned in China by an individual residing in China. The AO argued that the salary was taxable in India due to an existing employer-employee relationship. However, the ITAT agreed with the argument that as the individual was a tax resident of China, the salary income was taxable in China only. The ITAT held that the salary for services in China was exempt u/s Article 15(1) of the India-China DTAA. The ITAT directed the AO to allow the exemption, noting that the proportionate salary for services in India had already been taxed in India and the remaining salary in China. The individual had not claimed foreign tax credit. Decision favored the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
