Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IA due to the assessee's failure to file Form no.10CCB on time. The Tribunal found that the audit report was filed online by the assessee, albeit with a delay. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' decision, citing that the Supreme Court's ruling in Wipro Ltd. did not support the Revenue's case. The Tribunal noted that the amendment to section 80-IA(7) by the Finance Act, 2020, was not applicable to the assessment year in question. As the audit report was filed within the allowed time, the disallowance of the deduction u/s 80-IA was overturned, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IA due to the assessee's failure to file Form no.10CCB on time. The Tribunal found that the audit report was filed online by the assessee, albeit with a delay. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' decision, citing that the Supreme Court's ruling in Wipro Ltd. did not support the Revenue's case. The Tribunal noted that the amendment to section 80-IA(7) by the Finance Act, 2020, was not applicable to the assessment year in question. As the audit report was filed within the allowed time, the disallowance of the deduction u/s 80-IA was overturned, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.