Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal reviewed the rejection of registration u/s 12AB due to alleged violation of section 13(1)(b) as trust's objects were not solely for "SUNNI MUSLIMS." Tribunal found the trust to be religious cum charitable, with objects not limited to a specific religious community. The CIT(E) denied registration based on this restriction, invoking section 13(1)(b) and disallowing exemption u/s 11. Tribunal directed CIT(E) to reassess the registration application and grant it in accordance with the law. The appeal by the trust was allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal reviewed the rejection of registration u/s 12AB due to alleged violation of section 13(1)(b) as trust's objects were not solely for "SUNNI MUSLIMS." Tribunal found the trust to be religious cum charitable, with objects not limited to a specific religious community. The CIT(E) denied registration based on this restriction, invoking section 13(1)(b) and disallowing exemption u/s 11. Tribunal directed CIT(E) to reassess the registration application and grant it in accordance with the law. The appeal by the trust was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.