Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) addressed the issue of classifying imported goods as worn clothing under Customs Tariff Item No. 6309 90 00. The Tribunal upheld the classification of the goods as 'old and used garments' under Customs Tariff Heading 6309, rejecting the Revenue's claim for reclassification. The valuation of the goods at US$ 0.60 per kg (CIF) was found appropriate, with the adjudicating authority's enhancement from US$ 0.55 upheld. The redemption fine and penalty imposed were deemed sufficient, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found no errors in the impugned order and upheld it.
The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) addressed the issue of classifying imported goods as worn clothing under Customs Tariff Item No. 6309 90 00. The Tribunal upheld the classification of the goods as 'old and used garments' under Customs Tariff Heading 6309, rejecting the Revenue's claim for reclassification. The valuation of the goods at US$ 0.60 per kg (CIF) was found appropriate, with the adjudicating authority's enhancement from US$ 0.55 upheld. The redemption fine and penalty imposed were deemed sufficient, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found no errors in the impugned order and upheld it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
