Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a valuation issue concerning TDS deposited with the Income Tax Department related to payments to foreign service providers under reverse charge. Referring to a previous decision, it was established that the appellant is responsible for bearing the TDS as per the agreement terms. The TDS amount is not part of the value of services received, on which service tax under reverse charge is applicable. The appeal was allowed, finding no merit in the initial order.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a valuation issue concerning TDS deposited with the Income Tax Department related to payments to foreign service providers under reverse charge. Referring to a previous decision, it was established that the appellant is responsible for bearing the TDS as per the agreement terms. The TDS amount is not part of the value of services received, on which service tax under reverse charge is applicable. The appeal was allowed, finding no merit in the initial order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
