Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a valuation issue concerning TDS deposited with the Income Tax Department related to payments to foreign service providers under reverse charge. Referring to a previous decision, it was established that the appellant is responsible for bearing the TDS as per the agreement terms. The TDS amount is not part of the value of services received, on which service tax under reverse charge is applicable. The appeal was allowed, finding no merit in the initial order.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a valuation issue concerning TDS deposited with the Income Tax Department related to payments to foreign service providers under reverse charge. Referring to a previous decision, it was established that the appellant is responsible for bearing the TDS as per the agreement terms. The TDS amount is not part of the value of services received, on which service tax under reverse charge is applicable. The appeal was allowed, finding no merit in the initial order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
