Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns. The petitioner did not respond to a show cause notice. The court found that the petitioner relied on a notification for GST exemption. The impugned orders were set aside with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demands within two weeks, after crediting a specific amount already paid. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits.
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns. The petitioner did not respond to a show cause notice. The court found that the petitioner relied on a notification for GST exemption. The impugned orders were set aside with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demands within two weeks, after crediting a specific amount already paid. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
