Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns. The petitioner did not respond to a show cause notice. The court found that the petitioner relied on a notification for GST exemption. The impugned orders were set aside with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demands within two weeks, after crediting a specific amount already paid. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits.
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns. The petitioner did not respond to a show cause notice. The court found that the petitioner relied on a notification for GST exemption. The impugned orders were set aside with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demands within two weeks, after crediting a specific amount already paid. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
