Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment during search. ITAT found the disclosed gold and silver quantities reasonable based on CBDT guidelines. Assessee declared gold ornaments and silver items in HUF for deduction. ITAT directed AO to delete Rs. 28,96,104 addition. 2. Addition of cash found u/s 69A: Assessee explained Rs. 1,50,000 belonged to M/s. Sarvodaya Agrotech. AO added Rs. 3 lac cash found. CIT(A) sustained Rs. 2 lac addition, considering savings of Rs. 2 lac. ITAT found no merit in sustaining Rs. 2 lac addition, as assessee cooperated, disclosed income, and had wealth tax history. ITAT directed AO to delete the Rs. 2 lac cash addition.
In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment during search. ITAT found the disclosed gold and silver quantities reasonable based on CBDT guidelines. Assessee declared gold ornaments and silver items in HUF for deduction. ITAT directed AO to delete Rs. 28,96,104 addition. 2. Addition of cash found u/s 69A: Assessee explained Rs. 1,50,000 belonged to M/s. Sarvodaya Agrotech. AO added Rs. 3 lac cash found. CIT(A) sustained Rs. 2 lac addition, considering savings of Rs. 2 lac. ITAT found no merit in sustaining Rs. 2 lac addition, as assessee cooperated, disclosed income, and had wealth tax history. ITAT directed AO to delete the Rs. 2 lac cash addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
