Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved a dispute u/s DGFT Notification No.77(RE-2008)/2004-2009 regarding the import classification of Round Ridge Cement Tiles. The issue was whether the tiles should be treated as 'processed tiles' subject to a minimum value requirement of US$ 50 per square meter. The appellant sought clarification from DGFT, which confirmed that the tiles were free for import under a specific HS code. The Tribunal held that the clarification from DGFT was valid, and the tiles could be imported free of restrictions, overturning the previous decision that imposed restrictions on the import. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The case involved a dispute u/s DGFT Notification No.77(RE-2008)/2004-2009 regarding the import classification of Round Ridge Cement Tiles. The issue was whether the tiles should be treated as 'processed tiles' subject to a minimum value requirement of US$ 50 per square meter. The appellant sought clarification from DGFT, which confirmed that the tiles were free for import under a specific HS code. The Tribunal held that the clarification from DGFT was valid, and the tiles could be imported free of restrictions, overturning the previous decision that imposed restrictions on the import. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
