Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held ex-directors guilty of fraudulent concealment and misappropriation u/s 433(e) and 435 of the Companies Act, 1956. They failed to disclose sale consideration in company accounts. Third-party rights existed before winding-up. No collusion found. Ex-directors ordered to pay Rs. 3,60,000 with 12% penal interest to Official Liquidator within 30 days. Application disposed of.
The High Court held ex-directors guilty of fraudulent concealment and misappropriation u/s 433(e) and 435 of the Companies Act, 1956. They failed to disclose sale consideration in company accounts. Third-party rights existed before winding-up. No collusion found. Ex-directors ordered to pay Rs. 3,60,000 with 12% penal interest to Official Liquidator within 30 days. Application disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.