Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
281 to 300 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held ex-directors guilty of fraudulent concealment and misappropriation u/s 433(e) and 435 of the Companies Act, 1956. They failed to disclose sale consideration in company accounts. Third-party rights existed before winding-up. No collusion found. Ex-directors ordered to pay Rs. 3,60,000 with 12% penal interest to Official Liquidator within 30 days. Application disposed of.
The High Court held ex-directors guilty of fraudulent concealment and misappropriation u/s 433(e) and 435 of the Companies Act, 1956. They failed to disclose sale consideration in company accounts. Third-party rights existed before winding-up. No collusion found. Ex-directors ordered to pay Rs. 3,60,000 with 12% penal interest to Official Liquidator within 30 days. Application disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.