Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2741 to 2760 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held ex-directors guilty of fraudulent concealment and misappropriation u/s 433(e) and 435 of the Companies Act, 1956. They failed to disclose sale consideration in company accounts. Third-party rights existed before winding-up. No collusion found. Ex-directors ordered to pay Rs. 3,60,000 with 12% penal interest to Official Liquidator within 30 days. Application disposed of.
The High Court held ex-directors guilty of fraudulent concealment and misappropriation u/s 433(e) and 435 of the Companies Act, 1956. They failed to disclose sale consideration in company accounts. Third-party rights existed before winding-up. No collusion found. Ex-directors ordered to pay Rs. 3,60,000 with 12% penal interest to Official Liquidator within 30 days. Application disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
