Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of...
Court held that interim compensation under Section 143A of NI Act is discretionary. No proof of payment or written agreement in this case. Petition dismissed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque. Court clarified that the power to order interim compensation is discretionary and not a right. Petitioner alleged payment of Rs.20 lacs to respondent without lawful consideration, lacking proof or written agreement. Court held that discretion under u/s 143A can be interfered with only if found perverse or unreasonable. Not sitting as Court of Appeal against Trial Court's order. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque. Court clarified that the power to order interim compensation is discretionary and not a right. Petitioner alleged payment of Rs.20 lacs to respondent without lawful consideration, lacking proof or written agreement. Court held that discretion under u/s 143A can be interfered with only if found perverse or unreasonable. Not sitting as Court of Appeal against Trial Court's order. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
