Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of...
Court held that interim compensation under Section 143A of NI Act is discretionary. No proof of payment or written agreement in this case. Petition dismissed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque. Court clarified that the power to order interim compensation is discretionary and not a right. Petitioner alleged payment of Rs.20 lacs to respondent without lawful consideration, lacking proof or written agreement. Court held that discretion under u/s 143A can be interfered with only if found perverse or unreasonable. Not sitting as Court of Appeal against Trial Court's order. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque. Court clarified that the power to order interim compensation is discretionary and not a right. Petitioner alleged payment of Rs.20 lacs to respondent without lawful consideration, lacking proof or written agreement. Court held that discretion under u/s 143A can be interfered with only if found perverse or unreasonable. Not sitting as Court of Appeal against Trial Court's order. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
