Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of...
Court held that interim compensation under Section 143A of NI Act is discretionary. No proof of payment or written agreement in this case. Petition dismissed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque. Court clarified that the power to order interim compensation is discretionary and not a right. Petitioner alleged payment of Rs.20 lacs to respondent without lawful consideration, lacking proof or written agreement. Court held that discretion under u/s 143A can be interfered with only if found perverse or unreasonable. Not sitting as Court of Appeal against Trial Court's order. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
HC dismissed a petition seeking interim compensation u/s 143A of the NI Act for dishonour of cheque. Court clarified that the power to order interim compensation is discretionary and not a right. Petitioner alleged payment of Rs.20 lacs to respondent without lawful consideration, lacking proof or written agreement. Court held that discretion under u/s 143A can be interfered with only if found perverse or unreasonable. Not sitting as Court of Appeal against Trial Court's order. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
