Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and the time limit for notice u/s 149. The petitioner received a notice u/s 153C after a search operation in 2019, leading to an assessment order in 2023. The petitioner had appealed successfully against disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia) in the original assessment u/s 143(3). A subsequent notice u/s 148 related to a search in 2022, limited to AY 2014-15 per Section 149(1) proviso. Referring to Filatex India Ltd. and Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd., the Court found AY 2013-14 outside the ten-year block period u/s 153C and 153A, making the notice unsustainable.
The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and the time limit for notice u/s 149. The petitioner received a notice u/s 153C after a search operation in 2019, leading to an assessment order in 2023. The petitioner had appealed successfully against disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia) in the original assessment u/s 143(3). A subsequent notice u/s 148 related to a search in 2022, limited to AY 2014-15 per Section 149(1) proviso. Referring to Filatex India Ltd. and Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd., the Court found AY 2013-14 outside the ten-year block period u/s 153C and 153A, making the notice unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
