Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and the time limit for notice u/s 149. The petitioner received a notice u/s 153C after a search operation in 2019, leading to an assessment order in 2023. The petitioner had appealed successfully against disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia) in the original assessment u/s 143(3). A subsequent notice u/s 148 related to a search in 2022, limited to AY 2014-15 per Section 149(1) proviso. Referring to Filatex India Ltd. and Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd., the Court found AY 2013-14 outside the ten-year block period u/s 153C and 153A, making the notice unsustainable.
The High Court addressed the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and the time limit for notice u/s 149. The petitioner received a notice u/s 153C after a search operation in 2019, leading to an assessment order in 2023. The petitioner had appealed successfully against disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia) in the original assessment u/s 143(3). A subsequent notice u/s 148 related to a search in 2022, limited to AY 2014-15 per Section 149(1) proviso. Referring to Filatex India Ltd. and Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd., the Court found AY 2013-14 outside the ten-year block period u/s 153C and 153A, making the notice unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
