Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC considered a case involving offences u/s 276 C (2) r/w sec 278 B of Criminal Procedure for Economic Offences. Petitioners filed returns without paying tax, attributing it to auditors' mistake. They paid the tax upon realization. Citing M/s. Bejan Singh Eye Hospital Pvt. Ltd, HC held a positive act is needed to establish guilt u/s 276 C (2). Since petitioners paid tax with interest upon notice, showing no intent to evade tax, proceedings were quashed. Criminal Petition allowed, proceedings against petitioners quashed by HC.
HC considered a case involving offences u/s 276 C (2) r/w sec 278 B of Criminal Procedure for Economic Offences. Petitioners filed returns without paying tax, attributing it to auditors' mistake. They paid the tax upon realization. Citing M/s. Bejan Singh Eye Hospital Pvt. Ltd, HC held a positive act is needed to establish guilt u/s 276 C (2). Since petitioners paid tax with interest upon notice, showing no intent to evade tax, proceedings were quashed. Criminal Petition allowed, proceedings against petitioners quashed by HC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.