Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT addressed issues regarding exemption u/s 11 for excessive payments of salary and rent to persons specified u/s 13(3). The CIT(A) deleted the addition of excessive salary paid to a clerk, justifying it based on the clerk's qualifications and experience. The AO's disallowance of rent payments was overturned as the market rental report supported the payments. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating no basis for the AO's additions u/s 13(3). The ITAT concluded that the payments were not excessive u/s 13(3), allowing the exemption u/s 11. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT addressed issues regarding exemption u/s 11 for excessive payments of salary and rent to persons specified u/s 13(3). The CIT(A) deleted the addition of excessive salary paid to a clerk, justifying it based on the clerk's qualifications and experience. The AO's disallowance of rent payments was overturned as the market rental report supported the payments. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating no basis for the AO's additions u/s 13(3). The ITAT concluded that the payments were not excessive u/s 13(3), allowing the exemption u/s 11. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.