Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of assistance and incomplete requirements. Tribunal noted physical filing before due date and CBDT's extension of e-filing time limit due to difficulties. Held that physical filing was valid, directing CIT(A) to admit and decide the appeal on merits, providing ample hearing opportunity to the assessee. Remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of assistance and incomplete requirements. Tribunal noted physical filing before due date and CBDT's extension of e-filing time limit due to difficulties. Held that physical filing was valid, directing CIT(A) to admit and decide the appeal on merits, providing ample hearing opportunity to the assessee. Remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
