Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of assistance and incomplete requirements. Tribunal noted physical filing before due date and CBDT's extension of e-filing time limit due to difficulties. Held that physical filing was valid, directing CIT(A) to admit and decide the appeal on merits, providing ample hearing opportunity to the assessee. Remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of physical/manual filing of appeal u/s the Income Tax Rules. Assessee argued inability to e-file due to lack of assistance and incomplete requirements. Tribunal noted physical filing before due date and CBDT's extension of e-filing time limit due to difficulties. Held that physical filing was valid, directing CIT(A) to admit and decide the appeal on merits, providing ample hearing opportunity to the assessee. Remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
