Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on the classification of Cheeslings under Tariff Item 21069099 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The issue of availing exemption under Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. was settled in a previous case involving the same appellant. Despite Cheeslings not being fried, their sale as "Namkeen" qualified for the exemption. The Tribunal found no merit in the confirmed demands on the appellant and allowed the appeal in their favor.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on the classification of Cheeslings under Tariff Item 21069099 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The issue of availing exemption under Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. was settled in a previous case involving the same appellant. Despite Cheeslings not being fried, their sale as "Namkeen" qualified for the exemption. The Tribunal found no merit in the confirmed demands on the appellant and allowed the appeal in their favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
