Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The ITAT held that u/s 56(2)(viib), addition on premium amount in excess of FMV for issuing Optional Convertible Preference Shares to holding company is unsustainable. The NAV method for valuation is valid only for equity shares, not OCPS. FMV based on equity shares for conversion is justified. Allotting shares to 100% holding company benefits existing shareholders, defeating the purpose of deeming provision u/s 56(2)(viib). CIT(A)'s decision is upheld as it aligns with law and facts. Revenue's appeal is dismissed.
The ITAT held that u/s 56(2)(viib), addition on premium amount in excess of FMV for issuing Optional Convertible Preference Shares to holding company is unsustainable. The NAV method for valuation is valid only for equity shares, not OCPS. FMV based on equity shares for conversion is justified. Allotting shares to 100% holding company benefits existing shareholders, defeating the purpose of deeming provision u/s 56(2)(viib). CIT(A)'s decision is upheld as it aligns with law and facts. Revenue's appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.