Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that u/s 56(2)(viib), addition on premium amount in excess of FMV for issuing Optional Convertible Preference Shares to holding company is unsustainable. The NAV method for valuation is valid only for equity shares, not OCPS. FMV based on equity shares for conversion is justified. Allotting shares to 100% holding company benefits existing shareholders, defeating the purpose of deeming provision u/s 56(2)(viib). CIT(A)'s decision is upheld as it aligns with law and facts. Revenue's appeal is dismissed.
The ITAT held that u/s 56(2)(viib), addition on premium amount in excess of FMV for issuing Optional Convertible Preference Shares to holding company is unsustainable. The NAV method for valuation is valid only for equity shares, not OCPS. FMV based on equity shares for conversion is justified. Allotting shares to 100% holding company benefits existing shareholders, defeating the purpose of deeming provision u/s 56(2)(viib). CIT(A)'s decision is upheld as it aligns with law and facts. Revenue's appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.