Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the TP adjustment for software development services to AE. L&T Infotech was considered comparable, rejecting appellant's argument. Persistent Systems Ltd's exclusion request was denied as it was part of the final comparables list. Imputing interest on receivables should use prevailing Indian rates or LIBOR with markup. The case law supports market-determined rates for benchmarking. Disallowance of employee PF contribution was upheld u/s 36(1)(va) u/s 2(24)(x) based on Checkmate Services case, stating belated remittance is not deductible even if paid before the return filing due date.
The ITAT upheld the TP adjustment for software development services to AE. L&T Infotech was considered comparable, rejecting appellant's argument. Persistent Systems Ltd's exclusion request was denied as it was part of the final comparables list. Imputing interest on receivables should use prevailing Indian rates or LIBOR with markup. The case law supports market-determined rates for benchmarking. Disallowance of employee PF contribution was upheld u/s 36(1)(va) u/s 2(24)(x) based on Checkmate Services case, stating belated remittance is not deductible even if paid before the return filing due date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.