Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the TP adjustment for software development services to AE. L&T Infotech was considered comparable, rejecting appellant's argument. Persistent Systems Ltd's exclusion request was denied as it was part of the final comparables list. Imputing interest on receivables should use prevailing Indian rates or LIBOR with markup. The case law supports market-determined rates for benchmarking. Disallowance of employee PF contribution was upheld u/s 36(1)(va) u/s 2(24)(x) based on Checkmate Services case, stating belated remittance is not deductible even if paid before the return filing due date.
The ITAT upheld the TP adjustment for software development services to AE. L&T Infotech was considered comparable, rejecting appellant's argument. Persistent Systems Ltd's exclusion request was denied as it was part of the final comparables list. Imputing interest on receivables should use prevailing Indian rates or LIBOR with markup. The case law supports market-determined rates for benchmarking. Disallowance of employee PF contribution was upheld u/s 36(1)(va) u/s 2(24)(x) based on Checkmate Services case, stating belated remittance is not deductible even if paid before the return filing due date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.