Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's permission granted in 2008. Therefore, the capital gain addition in AY 2008-09 was deleted, and in AY 2009-10, it was converted from protective to substantive basis. The assessee's grounds were allowed.
The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's permission granted in 2008. Therefore, the capital gain addition in AY 2008-09 was deleted, and in AY 2009-10, it was converted from protective to substantive basis. The assessee's grounds were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.