Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's permission granted in 2008. Therefore, the capital gain addition in AY 2008-09 was deleted, and in AY 2009-10, it was converted from protective to substantive basis. The assessee's grounds were allowed.
The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's permission granted in 2008. Therefore, the capital gain addition in AY 2008-09 was deleted, and in AY 2009-10, it was converted from protective to substantive basis. The assessee's grounds were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.