Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's permission granted in 2008. Therefore, the capital gain addition in AY 2008-09 was deleted, and in AY 2009-10, it was converted from protective to substantive basis. The assessee's grounds were allowed.
The ITAT ruled that the transfer of booking rights in a capital asset was completed in AY 2009-10, not AY 2008-09. The agreement to sell was contingent on builder's permission granted in 2008. Therefore, the capital gain addition in AY 2008-09 was deleted, and in AY 2009-10, it was converted from protective to substantive basis. The assessee's grounds were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.