Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving revision u/s 263 of the Act related to annuity payments made to LIC. The employer did not make the annuity payment; it was made on employees' request from VRS amount. The claim for exemption u/s 10(10CC) and u/s 10(10BB) was found incorrect as per PCIT's enquiry. AO allowed exemptions without verifying from the employer, leading to an erroneous order. The annuity amount paid to LIC was deemed taxable as salary per Supreme Court ruling. The AO's failure to conduct proper inquiries rendered the order prejudicial to revenue. Jurisdiction u/s 263 was upheld, dismissing the assessee's appeals.
The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving revision u/s 263 of the Act related to annuity payments made to LIC. The employer did not make the annuity payment; it was made on employees' request from VRS amount. The claim for exemption u/s 10(10CC) and u/s 10(10BB) was found incorrect as per PCIT's enquiry. AO allowed exemptions without verifying from the employer, leading to an erroneous order. The annuity amount paid to LIC was deemed taxable as salary per Supreme Court ruling. The AO's failure to conduct proper inquiries rendered the order prejudicial to revenue. Jurisdiction u/s 263 was upheld, dismissing the assessee's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
