Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The case involves a Customs Broker's license revocation for involvement in mis-declaration and fraudulent export of "Uric Acid." The Commissioner of Customs followed the prescribed timeline u/s Regulation 20 of CBLR, 2013 for issuing Show Cause Notice, conducting inquiry, and issuing the Order-in-Original. The revocation proceedings were found not time-barred. The Broker's license was misused for financial gain in fraudulent transactions, leading to fine and forfeiture of security deposit. The Tribunal modified the order, setting aside license revocation but upholding the penalty and forfeiture.
The case involves a Customs Broker's license revocation for involvement in mis-declaration and fraudulent export of "Uric Acid." The Commissioner of Customs followed the prescribed timeline u/s Regulation 20 of CBLR, 2013 for issuing Show Cause Notice, conducting inquiry, and issuing the Order-in-Original. The revocation proceedings were found not time-barred. The Broker's license was misused for financial gain in fraudulent transactions, leading to fine and forfeiture of security deposit. The Tribunal modified the order, setting aside license revocation but upholding the penalty and forfeiture.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.