Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The case involved smuggling of gold bars of foreign origin, seized from two individuals boarding a train. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) intercepted them at a railway station and found gold bars concealed in their trolley bags. The individuals failed to produce any documents for the goods. The Adjudicating authority's decision to seize and confiscate the gold bars was upheld by the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Tribunal found no reason to interfere as the appellants did not provide specific evidence to challenge the decision. The appeal was dismissed.
The case involved smuggling of gold bars of foreign origin, seized from two individuals boarding a train. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) intercepted them at a railway station and found gold bars concealed in their trolley bags. The individuals failed to produce any documents for the goods. The Adjudicating authority's decision to seize and confiscate the gold bars was upheld by the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Tribunal found no reason to interfere as the appellants did not provide specific evidence to challenge the decision. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
