Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B, focusing on the alleged violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner filed a writ petition after 30 days from the order date. The court noted that prior notices were issued u/s 143(2) and 142(1), and the petitioner had responded. Despite knowing the deadline, the petitioner sought an adjournment, extending the response deadline. The petitioner attempted to submit a response after office hours, failing to demonstrate prejudice from the assessing officer's actions. The court found the order appealable and, despite no proven prejudice, granted the petitioner liberty to appeal within 15 days with a condonation request. The appellate authority must hear and decide the appeal within 6 weeks, considering the petitioner's response and grounds.
The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B, focusing on the alleged violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner filed a writ petition after 30 days from the order date. The court noted that prior notices were issued u/s 143(2) and 142(1), and the petitioner had responded. Despite knowing the deadline, the petitioner sought an adjournment, extending the response deadline. The petitioner attempted to submit a response after office hours, failing to demonstrate prejudice from the assessing officer's actions. The court found the order appealable and, despite no proven prejudice, granted the petitioner liberty to appeal within 15 days with a condonation request. The appellate authority must hear and decide the appeal within 6 weeks, considering the petitioner's response and grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
