Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 based on the belief that the investment in a property was from undisclosed income. However, the assessee provided evidence that the investment was from disclosed sources. The AO did not challenge this but made an independent addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for the property's valuation difference. The Tribunal held that since the AO did not question the source of investment, he lacked jurisdiction to make the additional assessment. The AO's order u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 was deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 based on the belief that the investment in a property was from undisclosed income. However, the assessee provided evidence that the investment was from disclosed sources. The AO did not challenge this but made an independent addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for the property's valuation difference. The Tribunal held that since the AO did not question the source of investment, he lacked jurisdiction to make the additional assessment. The AO's order u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 was deemed invalid, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
