Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee did not file the return of income u/s 139(1) but filed it after a notice u/s 148. The Tribunal held that as the self-assessment tax paid before the notice exceeded the tax on the income assessed, there was no tax sought to be evaded. Therefore, the penalty of Rs. 2,10,000 was unjustified and deleted. The Tribunal did not address other arguments raised by the assessee as the main ground for penalty imposition was not valid. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee did not file the return of income u/s 139(1) but filed it after a notice u/s 148. The Tribunal held that as the self-assessment tax paid before the notice exceeded the tax on the income assessed, there was no tax sought to be evaded. Therefore, the penalty of Rs. 2,10,000 was unjustified and deleted. The Tribunal did not address other arguments raised by the assessee as the main ground for penalty imposition was not valid. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
