Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The High Court considered an application for compounding contravention under FEMA. The petitioner filed Form FC-TRS belatedly, leading to investigations and complaints. The Court noted that Rule 8(2) of the Compounding Proceeding Rules requires the Compounding Authority to pass an order within 180 days and afford all concerned parties an opportunity to be heard. The Court found that investigations on money laundering charges were ongoing, preventing compounding proceedings. Rule 4(1) empowers the first respondent to compound contraventions, except those related to suspected money laundering. A proviso added to Rule 8(2) prohibits compounding contraventions suspected of terror financing or affecting national sovereignty, remitting such cases to the Adjudicating Authority. The compounding application was returned due to the proviso, which does not allow compounding of contraventions suspected of money laundering.
The High Court considered an application for compounding contravention under FEMA. The petitioner filed Form FC-TRS belatedly, leading to investigations and complaints. The Court noted that Rule 8(2) of the Compounding Proceeding Rules requires the Compounding Authority to pass an order within 180 days and afford all concerned parties an opportunity to be heard. The Court found that investigations on money laundering charges were ongoing, preventing compounding proceedings. Rule 4(1) empowers the first respondent to compound contraventions, except those related to suspected money laundering. A proviso added to Rule 8(2) prohibits compounding contraventions suspected of terror financing or affecting national sovereignty, remitting such cases to the Adjudicating Authority. The compounding application was returned due to the proviso, which does not allow compounding of contraventions suspected of money laundering.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
