Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The High Court addressed a challenge to three separate orders, alleging a breach of natural justice principles. The petitioner responded to discrepancies during inspection by providing necessary documents. The assessment orders were deemed questionable, and the petitioner was directed to pay specified amounts within a timeframe. The assessing officer was instructed to allow a personal hearing and issue fresh assessment orders within two months. The impugned assessment order was quashed with conditions, and the petition was disposed of.
The High Court addressed a challenge to three separate orders, alleging a breach of natural justice principles. The petitioner responded to discrepancies during inspection by providing necessary documents. The assessment orders were deemed questionable, and the petitioner was directed to pay specified amounts within a timeframe. The assessing officer was instructed to allow a personal hearing and issue fresh assessment orders within two months. The impugned assessment order was quashed with conditions, and the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.