Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court addressed a dispute regarding the release of seized goods before an Assembly Election process. The court held that release is permissible u/s the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 only if a Bond and Bank Guarantee are provided for the worth of the goods. The complainant's claim of a lower value for the goods was considered, and the court directed the release of the goods upon furnishing a Bond and Bank Guarantee for the revised lower value. The contempt complaint was disposed of with a directive for immediate release of the goods upon compliance with the specified requirements.
The High Court addressed a dispute regarding the release of seized goods before an Assembly Election process. The court held that release is permissible u/s the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 only if a Bond and Bank Guarantee are provided for the worth of the goods. The complainant's claim of a lower value for the goods was considered, and the court directed the release of the goods upon furnishing a Bond and Bank Guarantee for the revised lower value. The contempt complaint was disposed of with a directive for immediate release of the goods upon compliance with the specified requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.