Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
The Advance Ruling Authority addressed two key issues: 1) Whether a supplier, who is the owner of a vehicle, can charge GST on rental/hiring services under the Forward Charge Mechanism even if the service is exempted. The ruling stated that this question is not maintainable as the applicant did not undertake or propose to undertake any supply of renting/hiring vehicles. 2) Whether a Goods Transport Agency can claim Input Tax Credit based on supplier invoices. The ruling clarified that the Agency, paying GST under the Forward Charge Mechanism, can claim ITC under Section 16 of the GST Act 2017, provided conditions are met.
The Advance Ruling Authority addressed two key issues: 1) Whether a supplier, who is the owner of a vehicle, can charge GST on rental/hiring services under the Forward Charge Mechanism even if the service is exempted. The ruling stated that this question is not maintainable as the applicant did not undertake or propose to undertake any supply of renting/hiring vehicles. 2) Whether a Goods Transport Agency can claim Input Tax Credit based on supplier invoices. The ruling clarified that the Agency, paying GST under the Forward Charge Mechanism, can claim ITC under Section 16 of the GST Act 2017, provided conditions are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.