Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The Advance Ruling Authority addressed two key issues: 1) Whether a supplier, who is the owner of a vehicle, can charge GST on rental/hiring services under the Forward Charge Mechanism even if the service is exempted. The ruling stated that this question is not maintainable as the applicant did not undertake or propose to undertake any supply of renting/hiring vehicles. 2) Whether a Goods Transport Agency can claim Input Tax Credit based on supplier invoices. The ruling clarified that the Agency, paying GST under the Forward Charge Mechanism, can claim ITC under Section 16 of the GST Act 2017, provided conditions are met.
The Advance Ruling Authority addressed two key issues: 1) Whether a supplier, who is the owner of a vehicle, can charge GST on rental/hiring services under the Forward Charge Mechanism even if the service is exempted. The ruling stated that this question is not maintainable as the applicant did not undertake or propose to undertake any supply of renting/hiring vehicles. 2) Whether a Goods Transport Agency can claim Input Tax Credit based on supplier invoices. The ruling clarified that the Agency, paying GST under the Forward Charge Mechanism, can claim ITC under Section 16 of the GST Act 2017, provided conditions are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
