Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case involved smuggling of 154 mobile phones, leading to absolute confiscation and penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the goods were seized within India, not near the Bangladesh border, and lack of proper documents didn't prove illegal transportation. The Department failed to verify facts with order placers or provide concrete evidence of smuggling. As a result, the confiscation and penalty were overturned, and the appeal was allowed.
The case involved smuggling of 154 mobile phones, leading to absolute confiscation and penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the goods were seized within India, not near the Bangladesh border, and lack of proper documents didn't prove illegal transportation. The Department failed to verify facts with order placers or provide concrete evidence of smuggling. As a result, the confiscation and penalty were overturned, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
