Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated natural justice by not allowing the assessee a hearing. The CIT(A) should have decided the appeal on merits. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) must verify the exemption claim, grant relief if valid, and ensure the assessee's right to be heard before issuing a new order.
The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated natural justice by not allowing the assessee a hearing. The CIT(A) should have decided the appeal on merits. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) must verify the exemption claim, grant relief if valid, and ensure the assessee's right to be heard before issuing a new order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.