Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated natural justice by not allowing the assessee a hearing. The CIT(A) should have decided the appeal on merits. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) must verify the exemption claim, grant relief if valid, and ensure the assessee's right to be heard before issuing a new order.
The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated natural justice by not allowing the assessee a hearing. The CIT(A) should have decided the appeal on merits. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) must verify the exemption claim, grant relief if valid, and ensure the assessee's right to be heard before issuing a new order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
