Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order, noting a violation of natural justice principles due to lack of communication of show cause notice and order through means other than GST portal upload. Discrepancies between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A were reconciled in annual return GSTR-9. Petitioner, though not participating in proceedings, reconciled disparities in the return. The court held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to contest the tax demand. The impugned order was quashed, with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demand within two weeks for the petition to be allowed.
The High Court addressed a challenge to an assessment order, noting a violation of natural justice principles due to lack of communication of show cause notice and order through means other than GST portal upload. Discrepancies between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A were reconciled in annual return GSTR-9. Petitioner, though not participating in proceedings, reconciled disparities in the return. The court held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to contest the tax demand. The impugned order was quashed, with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demand within two weeks for the petition to be allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
