Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the condonation of delay in filing an appeal u/s 100(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017. The appellant, a Tamilnadu Government-owned Electricity Generation and Distribution Utility, sought condonation of a one-day delay in filing the appeal, citing reasons of staff shortage and administrative issues. The AAAR noted that the appeal should have been filed within 30 days of receiving the order, which was on 12.02.2024. The appellant's explanation for the delay was accepted as not deliberate, and the delay of one day was deemed condonable u/s 100(2). The AAAR, empowered u/s 101(1) of the Acts, allowed the condonation, and the appeal will proceed for consideration on merits. The AAAR granted the COD application.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the condonation of delay in filing an appeal u/s 100(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017. The appellant, a Tamilnadu Government-owned Electricity Generation and Distribution Utility, sought condonation of a one-day delay in filing the appeal, citing reasons of staff shortage and administrative issues. The AAAR noted that the appeal should have been filed within 30 days of receiving the order, which was on 12.02.2024. The appellant's explanation for the delay was accepted as not deliberate, and the delay of one day was deemed condonable u/s 100(2). The AAAR, empowered u/s 101(1) of the Acts, allowed the condonation, and the appeal will proceed for consideration on merits. The AAAR granted the COD application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
