Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the condonation of delay in filing an appeal u/s 100(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017. The appellant, a Tamilnadu Government-owned Electricity Generation and Distribution Utility, sought condonation of a one-day delay in filing the appeal, citing reasons of staff shortage and administrative issues. The AAAR noted that the appeal should have been filed within 30 days of receiving the order, which was on 12.02.2024. The appellant's explanation for the delay was accepted as not deliberate, and the delay of one day was deemed condonable u/s 100(2). The AAAR, empowered u/s 101(1) of the Acts, allowed the condonation, and the appeal will proceed for consideration on merits. The AAAR granted the COD application.
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) considered the condonation of delay in filing an appeal u/s 100(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017. The appellant, a Tamilnadu Government-owned Electricity Generation and Distribution Utility, sought condonation of a one-day delay in filing the appeal, citing reasons of staff shortage and administrative issues. The AAAR noted that the appeal should have been filed within 30 days of receiving the order, which was on 12.02.2024. The appellant's explanation for the delay was accepted as not deliberate, and the delay of one day was deemed condonable u/s 100(2). The AAAR, empowered u/s 101(1) of the Acts, allowed the condonation, and the appeal will proceed for consideration on merits. The AAAR granted the COD application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
