Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The High Court addressed a challenge to summons issued u/s 81 of TNVAT Act, 2006 in Form PP to petitioners for document submission. Petitioner argued Form PP applies only to third parties, not assesses. Court held Section 22(3) of TNVAT Act, 2006 and Rule 10(11) of TNVAT Rules, 2007 aim to select 20% assessments for detailed scrutiny. Assessment completion u/s 22 doesn't bar Assessing Officer from seeking info from listed dealers. Commercial Tax Dept. can summon petitioners for records to verify return accuracy. Court found no merit in the petitions and dismissed them.
The High Court addressed a challenge to summons issued u/s 81 of TNVAT Act, 2006 in Form PP to petitioners for document submission. Petitioner argued Form PP applies only to third parties, not assesses. Court held Section 22(3) of TNVAT Act, 2006 and Rule 10(11) of TNVAT Rules, 2007 aim to select 20% assessments for detailed scrutiny. Assessment completion u/s 22 doesn't bar Assessing Officer from seeking info from listed dealers. Commercial Tax Dept. can summon petitioners for records to verify return accuracy. Court found no merit in the petitions and dismissed them.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.